Skip to main content
When your diagnostic is released, you land on your CoTerminal founder dashboard — nine sections of structured decision output assembled from your intake, conditioned by your market context, and reviewed by the CoTerminal team before you see a single word. The dashboard is not a report you skim. It is a decision instrument you work through in a specific sequence, accepting each section before advancing to the next. That sequence exists for a reason: the verdict means more when you understand the reasoning that produced it.

​
The Acceptance Flow

The first time you access your dashboard, you move through a four-step gated acceptance flow. You must complete each step — and confirm you understand it — before the next section unlocks. This is intentional. The acceptance flow ensures you engage with the full reasoning chain behind your verdict, not just the headline.
1

Step 1 — Verdict

You see your Locked Verdict: the strategic direction (Refine, Pivot, Rebuild, Validate, or Scale), the confidence range, and the recommended action. Confirm “I understand and accept” to proceed.
2

Step 2 — Reasoning & Evidence

You see the full reasoning chain and evidence behind the verdict — what the system found, what it weighted, and why it reached this direction. Confirm “I understand and accept” to proceed.
3

Step 3 — Goal Alignment & Math

You see your stated goal, your time horizon, and the probability analysis of achieving it on your current trajectory. Confirm “I understand and accept” to proceed.
4

Step 4 — Leverage Moves & Action Plan

You see your three highest-leverage actions and the full Living Action Plan. Confirming here moves you into your 30-day execution workspace. Your 30-day clock starts now.
If you believe your verdict is factually incorrect based on evidence not captured in your intake, there is a dispute process available during the acceptance flow. Disagreeing with the verdict’s direction is not grounds for a dispute — strong counter-evidence is. If you escalate a dispute, your workspace enters a temporary read-only state while the CoTerminal team reviews. You will see a “Further diligence in progress” notice. You can still view your dashboard; you simply cannot advance into execution mode until review is complete. This is a protective review state, not a penalty.

​
The Nine Dashboard Sections

Once you complete the acceptance flow, all nine sections are available throughout your 30-day execution workspace.
Your locked strategic verdict — one of five directions (Refine, Pivot, Rebuild, Validate, or Scale) — with a confidence range and recommended action. The confidence range reflects the quality of your intake and the strength of the signal the pipeline found. A narrow range means strong evidence; a wide range means the system is reasoning from thinner data. The “What Would Sharpen This Analysis” note tells you exactly what additional data would tighten it.
The full evidence chain behind your verdict. This section shows you what each of the eight domain reasoners found, how the cross-check layer stress-tested the reasoning, and what the synthesis layer weighted most heavily. This is not a summary — it is the actual reasoning your verdict is grounded in.
Your stated goal, your time horizon, and the probability analysis of achieving it given your current trajectory. This section shows the math behind the verdict — what your current growth rate, burn, and market conditions imply about your goal’s achievability — and where the gaps are.
The three highest-leverage actions available to you in your current situation, ranked by expected impact. These are not generic strategic recommendations — they are derived from your specific intake, market position, and capacity. Your Living Action Plan flows from these moves.
An assessment of your AI product’s technical foundations from two perspectives:
  • Operator View: How your AI foundations affect your ability to execute the verdict — reliability, scalability, integration dependencies.
  • Technical View: The underlying architecture, model dependencies, data pipeline maturity, and technical debt that affect your strategic options.
Competitive landscape analysis, market maturity assessment, and go-to-market viability. This section covers where you sit in the competitive field, whether market timing is working for or against you, and how your current GTM motion maps to the verdict direction.
The financial and operational baseline, and what happens if you act on the verdict versus if you do not. The Consequence Thread is the “cost of inaction” analysis — it makes explicit what your current trajectory produces if nothing changes.
Product, business, and AI-specific risks with severity scores and estimated financial impact. Risks are not listed generically — they are derived from your intake context and weighted by their relevance to your verdict direction.
Pricing fit, revenue health, burn dynamics, scaling ceiling analysis, and AI cost economics. This section surfaces the financial mechanics behind the verdict — including whether your current pricing model supports the direction you need to go.

​
Understanding Your Confidence Range

Your verdict carries a confidence range — for example, 72–84% or 55–75%. This range is always expressed as an interval, never a single point estimate. Here is what the width of that range tells you:

Narrow Range (e.g., 78–84%)

High-quality intake with strong, consistent signal across domains. The pipeline found clear evidence and the reasoning converged tightly. Your verdict is well-supported.

Wide Range (e.g., 55–75%)

The system is reasoning from thinner or more contradictory evidence. The verdict direction is still valid, but with more uncertainty. The “What Would Sharpen This Analysis” section tells you exactly what data would tighten the range.

​
MIA Chat

MIA is your AI reasoning partner throughout your dashboard and execution workspace. You can ask MIA to explain any section of your dashboard, explore the implications of a decision, or think through how to communicate your verdict to your board or team.
Use MIA to go deeper on sections that surprise you. If your Reasoning & Evidence section surfaces something you did not expect, ask MIA to explain the weighting. If your Goal Alignment math looks unfamiliar, ask MIA to walk through the calculation.
Your Locked Verdict does not change based on disagreement or pushback in MIA chat. MIA can explain, contextualize, and help you work with the verdict — but it does not revise the system’s judgment because you prefer a different answer. If you have strong counter-evidence, use the dispute process, not MIA chat.